Team Project 4
UX Evaluation
Due Sunday November 20 before 11:30pm
Overview
For the fourth phase of the team project, you will conduct usability
tests, either with paper prototypes or software-based designs
(e.g. HTML or Axure). You will then revise the design to
address any usability problems you observed during the tests.
Assignment Requirements
Your tests should involve at least one participant per team
member. The informed consent and the task "instructions" must be
scripted, but all other aspects of the test may be informally
conducted.
Test Roles
Rettig mentions several roles that team members can play while
conducting a test: greeter, facilitator, computer, and observers. You
will find descriptions of these roles in his article, "Prototyping for
Tiny Fingers." To carry our your test, assign members of your team to
these roles. For small groups, you will need to consolidate some of
the roles. For example, the greeter and the facilitator is often the
same person. While not ideal, it is possible to conduct the test with
just one practitioner.
Test Design
In your last assignment, you describe testing scenarios for your
designs. For this assignment, you should develop the testing
procedure for these scenarios. We will discuss tests and conduct
pilot runs in class. The text and the Rettig article also provides
some suggestions.
Write out your instructions to the participant and decide in advance
when and if you will intervene while the test is running. We will
discuss how to write good instructions in class.
Evaluation Process
When conducting each test, make sure you do the following:
- Obtain the informed consent of each participant.
- Make the participant feel comfortable and ensure that he or she is not
being tested.
- Follow your test script and read your instructions.
- Observers should record the user's actions that are relevant to
your testing scenarios.
- When the test is over, thank the participant and answer any
questions.
The Report
Your report should include the following sections.
- Executive summary. This summary is a one-to-two paragraph
summary describing the test, its results and changes made to your design.
- Test Plan. This is a couple of paragraphs describing how you conducted your test.
- Results Summary. This section summarizes events and measures (if any) that were observed from the test.
- Findings and Recommendations Summary. This section summarizes interpretations and recommendations. They should be clearly based on what was observed from the results section.
- Redesign summary. This section describes and motivates the changes you made to your designs. You may want to include and refer to screen shots when presenting your changes.
- Appendix: Test materials. This final section is really an appendix consisting of the details and materials you used to conduct the usability test. It has the following documents:
- Team Member Roles. List your team members and specify the
roles they play. If they vary from the descriptions provided by
Rettig, explain them.
- Consent statement. Document how each participant consented to
participate in your test.
- Instructions. Provide the script of instructions that are
read to each participant.
- Detailed Results. Provide your documentation of the
detailed results. It should include an organized set of notes from
the usability tests.
- Also provide a description of how team members contributed to this
project in addition to their test roles.
Team Process
The following is a recommended set of team phases and deadlines:
- Specify objective and task instructions.
(Friday November 11). As a team, decide on at least one test objective, a task that addresses it and written scenario instructions for the test user.
- Testing. (Tuesday November 15). Each team member should conduct at least one usability test.
- Consolidation of results, findings and
recommendation. (Friday November 18). List objective results and work out findings. Recommendation can be used to summarize changes in the interaction design.
- Finalize. (Sunday November 20). Write executive summary. Edit and proofread. Submit!
Submission
Submit your report to D2L as a PDF document.
Grading
This project is worth 10% of the course grade. The following criteria will be used for scoring the report:
- Report organization and presentation. The
report is well written and organized so that it is easy to find
required information. Results, findings and recommendations are
clearly and appropriately separated.
- Report completeness. The report has all
required contents.
- Process. The shows that appropriate methods were followed.
- Supported design. Results support the findings.
Findings suppor the changes in the design.